Reflection: Sophie
Steckerl
In my Op-Ed article I had some positives in my rubric.
After all the practice we have had this year about commas, compound-complex
sentences, spelling, and capitalization in Mr. Ferrebee’s class, I got a 3.5 in
that bench mark. I have improved my grammaticism extremely over the past couple
of months. Now I understand why we spent so much time practicing our grammar.
Thank you Mr. Ferrebee, I am greatly appreciative.
*An example of a plus in my article would be:
In my opinion a human rights group has
all the “right” to go into countries like Russia, that haven’t had a good
history with human rights and, try to change and observe what is going on in
that country.
I also had negatives in my Op-Ed article. I didn’t use
pathos, ethos and logos as strongly as I should of. My title, structure, and
arguments were also lacking strength. Sometime I was off topic, for example in
my introduction: We have been learning
and discussing topics like: women’s rights, fear,
power, politics, religion, torture, revolution, capital punishment, human
rights, government oppression, globalization, family, and education. With ever negative in life there is a lesson. I would
like to raise my grade because I know I am capable of much more than a 2.5.
No comments:
Post a Comment